6 min read

Understanding data security terms in HIPAA

Lusanda Molefe Apr 5, 2025 3:32:34 PM

HIPAA Compliance

Understanding data security terms in HIPAA

The healthcare industry operates within a landscape of increasing cyber threats, making the protection of sensitive patient data, or electronic protected health information (ePHI), a concern mandated by HIPAA.

The financial implications of failing to safeguard this data are staggering. An IBM report indicates that the average cost of a healthcare data breach in 2024 reached as high as $9.77 million. Research by Cybersecurity Ventures also projects that global cybercrime costs will reach $10.5 trillion annually by 2025.

These figures show the need for healthcare organizations to adopt cybersecurity measures. Modern intrusion detection systems (IDS) that leverage the power of machine learning (ML) have become necessary tools in this fight. Understanding the technical terminology behind these systems can help healthcare professionals understand how these technologies contribute to achieving and maintaining HIPAA compliance.

Understanding fundamental concepts for HIPAA compliance

IDS and HIPAA: An IDS acts as a digital security guard, continuously monitoring a healthcare organization's network and computer systems for any signs of unauthorized access or malicious activity.
- How it helps with HIPAA compliance: An IDS plays a role in fulfilling HIPAA's administrative safeguards. For instance, it aids in implementing security incident procedures (45 CFR § 164.308(a)(6)) by providing real-time alerts when suspicious behavior is detected, allowing for prompt investigation and remediation. It also contributes to the security awareness and training program (45 CFR § 164.308(a)(5)) by providing logs and reports that can be used to educate staff on potential threats and vulnerabilities.
ML and HIPAA: Machine learning algorithms can analyze vast datasets to identify patterns and make predictions or decisions without being explicitly programmed. In cybersecurity, this allows IDS to adapt to new threats in real-time.
- How it helps with HIPAA compliance: HIPAA's technical safeguards are met by the adaptability of ML-powered IDS, which continuously learns from network traffic and identifies subtle anomalies that might indicate sophisticated attacks. ML helps ensure the ongoing confidentiality, integrity, and availability of ePHI (45 CFR § 164.306(a)(1)), a core tenet of HIPAA.

Evolution from traditional methods for HIPAA security

Signature-based detection and HIPAA: Traditional IDS rely on a database of signatures – unique patterns associated with known malware or attacks. When network traffic matches a signature, an alert is triggered.
- How it helps with data security: While signature-based systems offer a first line of defense against well-established threats, their effectiveness against novel or customized attacks is limited. For HIPAA compliance, this approach alone is insufficient as it leaves organizations vulnerable to new and evolving threats that could compromise ePHI. According to a research paper titled RCLNet: an effective anomaly-based intrusion detection for securing the IoMT system, traditional machine learning methods often struggle to capture the complex patterns in IoMT (Internet of Medical Things) data, and conventional intrusion detection systems frequently fail to identify unknown attacks, leading to high false positive rates and compromised patient data security
Zero-day attacks and HIPAA: These attacks exploit vulnerabilities that are unknown to software vendors or security teams, meaning no protective signatures exist when the attack is first launched.
- How it hinders HIPAA compliance (if not addressed): Healthcare organizations relying solely on signature-based IDS are particularly susceptible to zero-day attacks. A successful zero-day exploit can grant attackers unauthorized access to ePHI, leading to a significant HIPAA breach and substantial penalties. A stark example of the potential consequences of a zero-day exploit is the MOVEit data breach of May 2023. This widespread attack leveraged a previously unknown SQL injection vulnerability in the MOVEit file transfer software. While not exclusively targeting healthcare, this breach affected over a thousand organizations globally, including entities within the healthcare sector. The zero-day nature of the exploit meant that traditional signature-based detection systems were unable to prevent the initial intrusions. Attackers, identified as the Clop ransomware group, successfully exfiltrated sensitive data, which in the case of healthcare organizations, would likely include ePHI.

The power of machine learning in intrusion detection for stronger HIPAA posture

Anomaly-based detection and HIPAA: ML-driven IDS establishes a baseline of what constitutes "normal" network activity, user behavior, and system operations. Any deviation from this baseline that falls outside acceptable parameters is flagged as a potential anomaly, warranting further investigation.
- How it helps with HIPAA compliance: Anomaly detection significantly enhances HIPAA compliance by identifying potential insider threats (e.g., unauthorized access by employees) and external attacks that don't match known signatures. This proactive approach helps organizations adhere to HIPAA's access control requirements (45 CFR § 164.308(a)(4)) and detect suspicious activity before it escalates into a full-blown data breach involving ePHI. For instance, an anomaly could be an unusual number of patient records being accessed by an employee who typically doesn't handle that volume, or network traffic originating from an unexpected geographic location.

Machine learning algorithms and their role in HIPAA compliance

Supervised learning and HIPAA: These algorithms are trained on labeled datasets, where each piece of data is tagged as either normal or malicious. The algorithm learns to associate specific patterns with known threats.
- How Decision Trees, Support Vector Machines (SVMs), and Random Forests help with HIPAA compliance: These algorithms can be highly effective at classifying network traffic, identifying phishing emails, or detecting known types of malware that could be used to steal or encrypt ePHI. For example, a Decision Tree might learn that a high number of failed login attempts from a specific IP address indicates a brute-force attack. An SVM could be trained to differentiate between legitimate and malicious email attachments. A Random Forest, by combining multiple decision trees, can improve the accuracy of these classifications, strengthening the defenses around ePHI. A study demonstrates the effectiveness of combining network flow metrics and biometric information for intrusion detection using these supervised learning methods
Unsupervised learning and HIPAA: These algorithms work with unlabeled data, meaning they must identify patterns and anomalies on their own, without prior knowledge of what constitutes a threat.
- How K-means clustering and Autoencoders help with HIPAA compliance: K-means clustering can group similar network traffic patterns together, allowing security teams to identify clusters that deviate significantly from the norm, potentially indicating a new or unknown attack vector targeting ePHI. Autoencoders learn to represent normal data and can flag instances that cannot be accurately reconstructed, which might signify malicious activity or data corruption attempts that could impact the integrity of ePHI. These techniques are valuable for discovering novel threats that signature-based systems would miss. The study above also utilizes deep learning-based LSTM (long short-term memory) models for proficiently recognizing network interruptions in the healthcare sector.
Deep learning and HIPAA: Using artificial neural networks with multiple layers, deep learning algorithms can analyze complex and high-dimensional data, such as network traffic over time or the structure of malicious code, to identify subtle and sophisticated attack patterns.
- How Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) help with HIPAA compliance: RNNs are particularly effective at analyzing sequential data like network traffic flows, enabling them to detect patterns that evolve over time, such as advanced persistent threats (APTs) attempting to infiltrate systems holding ePHI. CNNs are adept at analyzing structured data, including identifying malicious code or anomalies within network packets that might indicate a sophisticated attack. These deep learning models provide a powerful layer of defense against the most advanced threats that could lead to large-scale HIPAA breaches.

Technical elements supporting HIPAA's Security Rule

Feature selection and RFE (Recursive Feature Elimination)

Feature selection involves identifying the most relevant data points (features) from network traffic or system logs that indicate malicious activity. RFE is a specific technique that repeatedly removes less important features to improve model performance. By focusing on the most critical indicators of threats to ePHI, these methods enhance the accuracy of the IDS and reduce the number of false alarms, allowing security personnel to focus on genuine security incidents.

Ridge regression

Ridge regression is a regularization technique used in ML to prevent overfitting (when a model performs well on training data but poorly on new, unseen data), making the intrusion detection models more effective and less likely to flag legitimate activity as malicious. This is important for maintaining the availability of systems that provide access to ePHI by minimizing disruptions caused by false positives.

Network monitoring

ML-based IDS provides continuous, real-time analysis of network traffic. This constant vigilance detects and responds to security incidents that could impact the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of ePHI, directly supporting HIPAA's technical safeguard requirements for audit controls (45 CFR § 164.312(a)(2)(i)) and integrity controls (45 CFR § 164.312(e)).

Endpoint protection

Integrating ML into endpoint security solutions strengthens the security of individual devices (desktops, laptops, mobile devices) that employees use to access ePHI. ML can detect and block malware, ransomware, and other threats at the device level, preventing them from spreading to the broader network and compromising patient data, thus supporting HIPAA’s requirements for workstation security (45 CFR § 164.310(e)).

Cloud security

For healthcare organizations utilizing cloud services for storing and processing ePHI, ML-powered IDS monitor access patterns, identify unauthorized login attempts, and detect malicious activity within cloud-based applications and storage, ensuring compliance with HIPAA’s guidelines for securing ePHI in the cloud, which includes implementing encryption both in transit and at rest (45 CFR § 164.312(a)(2)(iv) and 45 CFR § 164.312(e)(2)(ii)).

IoT device security

The increasing number of IoMT devices presents unique security challenges. ML-based IDS can learn the normal behavior of these devices and detect anomalies that might indicate a compromise. By securing these devices, healthcare organizations can protect the ePHI they transmit and process, aligning with HIPAA's overall goal of safeguarding patient data across all connected systems.

Go deeper: The role of cloud technology in HIPAA compliance