Preemption is a principle that promotes a uniform legal framework across states, particularly in areas where federal regulation is needed to address national concerns like healthcare. The goal is to avoid conflicting state laws that could disrupt interstate transactions and confuse citizens. There are two types of preemption: express and implied, which define the relationship between state and federal laws.
According to a paper published by the Congressional Research Service, “The Supreme Court has identified two general ways in which federal law can preempt state law. First, federal law can expressly preempt state law when a federal statute or regulation contains explicit preemptive language. Second, federal law can impliedly preempt state law when Congress’s preemptive intent is implicit in the relevant federal law’s structure and purpose.” Both express and implied preemption form part of the legislative framework of the U.S. legal system influencing the way legislation is interpreted and individual rights are interpreted.
Express preemption occurs when federal legislation overrides state laws. For example, HIPAA’s Privacy Rule provides for legislative preemption over state laws when it comes to a patient's request for access to copies of medical records.
Implied preemption arises when federal law does not explicitly state its intent but is so comprehensive or conflicting with state law that it leaves no room for state regulation.
This can be divided into: field preemption where federal laws are so extensive in their provisions that there is not room for state regulation and conflict preemption when compliance with federal and state laws is impossible or where state laws stand as an obstacle to the objectives of federal law.
The form of preemption that applies to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act is express preemption. It is evidenced in HIPAA’s provisions which explicitly state that federal law will preempt state laws that are contrary to its requirements especially when these state laws have less severe protections for protected health information (PHI). As a result, while states can implement laws that offer greater privacy protections than HIPAA, they cannot enact laws that undermine or conflict with federal standards.
State laws can preempt federal law in certain cases, especially regarding the sharing of reproductive information or abortion bans due to the principle of state sovereignty. This is the recognition that states have the authority to regulate matters that directly affect public health and safety. States may enact laws that impose stricter regulations on reproductive health services than those established at the federal level, reflecting local values and political climates. Following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade, many states have implemented abortion laws that either restrict or protect access to the service, overriding federal protections that previously existed. This form of preemption occurs because states are often seen as positioned to address the specific needs and concerns of their populations regarding healthcare.
Related: HIPAA Compliant Email: The Definitive Guide
The Supremacy Clause is a provision in the U.S. Constitution that establishes that federal law takes precedence over state laws when there is a conflict between the two.
Federal preemption occurs when federal law explicitly overrides state law while state preemption is a situation where state law can limit or negate federal within its jurisdiction.
U.S. courts determine whether a state law is preempted by federal law by examining the intent of Congress, evaluating whether the federal regulation is comprehensive enough to occupy the field, and assessing whether compliance with both laws is possible or if the state law obstructs the objectives of federal legislation.