2 min read
DOJ targets neurofeedback billing in $15M behavioral health fraud case
Gugu Ntsele May 8, 2025 5:15:16 PM

Federal prosecutors have charged a Minnesota couple with orchestrating a $15 million healthcare fraud scheme involving overbilling and false claims for neurofeedback and other behavioral health services across multiple clinic locations.
What happened
Gabriel Adam Alexander Luthor and Elizabeth Christine Brown were charged on March 6, 2025, in a newly unsealed federal indictment filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. The couple allegedly used shell companies and related entities to perpetrate fraud through questionable billing practices, causing over $15 million in improper payments from government and commercial payors including Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers. The scheme reportedly operated over several years and involved a network of behavioral health clinics offering neurofeedback therapy, a treatment that uses real-time monitoring of brainwave activity to help improve emotional regulation and stress resilience.
Going deeper
The indictment details multiple alleged fraudulent practices:
- Fraudulent overbilling: Submitting false and inflated claims for services that were not provided, not medically necessary, or not eligible for reimbursement
- Improper use of billing codes: Multiple coding abuses including:
- Billing neurofeedback therapy using CPT codes intended for reimbursable biofeedback services
- Using combinations of billing codes not permitted to be billed together
- Improperly applying CPT Modifier 59 to indicate separate procedures
- Misrepresenting service duration to justify higher-paying codes
- Disregard of payor warnings: Continuing improper billing practices despite receiving repeated denials and warnings from insurers, including CMS
- Misuse of funds: Diverting proceeds for personal use, including expenditures related to Luthor's personal relationships
What was said
"Defrauding critical healthcare programs like Medicaid and Medicare burden systems designed to serve patients and puts them at risk," said Special Agent in Charge Alvin M. Winston Sr. of FBI Minneapolis in a press release. "The FBI and our partners will not tolerate those who abuse the healthcare system for personal gain and will pursue justice on behalf of taxpayers and patients."
In the know
Neurofeedback is a therapeutic intervention marketed as a non-invasive alternative to medication for treating anxiety, ADHD, depression, and related conditions. While the FDA has cleared some neurofeedback devices, its clinical efficacy remains debated in the medical community, and reimbursement policies vary widely across insurance providers. The therapy has been gaining popularity in both clinical and wellness settings, making it an attractive target for potential billing fraud as providers navigate complex reimbursement landscapes.
Why it matters
This $15 million neurofeedback scheme highlights specific vulnerabilities in behavioral health billing systems. Neurofeedback therapy exists in a gray area for insurers—while gaining popularity for treating conditions like ADHD and anxiety, its reimbursement policies vary widely, creating opportunities for fraud. The case shows how the intentional misuse of CPT codes (particularly substituting biofeedback codes for neurofeedback services) can lead to millions in inappropriate payments. It also demonstrates how the DOJ is now specifically targeting emerging therapeutic modalities where billing standards remain in flux. For behavioral health practitioners offering neurofeedback, this case is s warning about the consequences of improper billing practices, even when receiving payor denials and warnings.
The bottom line
Healthcare providers offering emerging treatments like neurofeedback, TMS, or ketamine therapy should ensure compliance programs are in place. Best practices include maintaining proper clinical oversight and licensure, implementing regular third-party billing audits, and creating a strong culture of compliance with enforced internal processes. Investors in behavioral health businesses should conduct thorough due diligence on billing practices, especially for novel treatments with variable reimbursement policies.